Find a Lawyer

RAJA MUHAMMAD NAZAR versus ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (GENERAL)/DY. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER RAWALPINDI

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Scheme for Urban Property Management and Settlement, 1977 Constitution Request Cancellation of vacant property allotment Initially, the applicant applied for reservation of the entire property but still part of it. A price deposit was called. Marles and 4-Term Permanent Transfer Order issued in favor of the applicant specified the area to be transferred to, but before the issuance of the Permanent Transfer Order there was mention of the area in which the department demanded payment of payment. Followed The applicant submitted an association agreement detailing the scale of the land 8/4 and the figures were raised by the officials and parties as 8 Marl and 4 heads in the process and the applicant. The complaint was that the area for which they applied was not allotted, but less land was allotted to them and the plot was canceled by the legality of the reservation authorities of the land because of the government action. The figure of 8/4 was declared 8 Mar and 4 plus and the applicants were the signatories of the Association process. And they were obedient to the allotment order. The Permanent Transfer Order was properly issued by the Settlement Authority which could not claim the full amount of property for the area with 8 Marla and 4 Mutual Petitions and to the extent of the area mentioned in the Permanent Exchange. Was entitled Order High Court directs the Settlement Authorities to issue necessary title documents for approval of arrears. immigration advocates from Rangoo lawyer