MUHAMMAD SULEMAN versus SIKANDAR HAYAT
A. XXXVII, 2 and 3 suits for recovery of loan based on promise space, leave to appear for leave and application for defense suit, and request for defense from defendant's story received by the defendant. The debt adjustment and the cancellation of the promissory note were found to be false and unreliable and were rejected by the trial court trial court, in which case, the defendant's right to refuse leave was deemed unreasonable in the absence of any legal weakness. In the meantime, the judgment and order passed by the trial court cannot be interfered with.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Chak Sheza lawyer
