Find a Lawyer

KHALID SAEED BUTT versus THE STATE

Section (c) definition of evidence, conviction, reduction of statements of prosecution witnesses on the material parts was permanent and it cannot be said that the accused was not arrested on the spot and his recovery had no effect. There was no reason for permanent disbelief. The statements of the prosecution witnesses did not show any hostility or resentment by the respective officers for the false allegations of the accused. The accused was investigated at the same time. The officer cannot be because in the case of drugs, if any of the accused was arrested, it is not time to look for the investigating officer. It was the responsibility of the officers or the police or the public, if they saw any identifiable crime for the arrest of the accused and handed it over to the police when the accused was arrested. Recovery notes were prepared by him and he sent a case for registration, nothing illegal, in cases, after the complaint was filed for registration of the FIR, the preparation of recovery notes During the incident, the accused was arrested on the spot, according to the investigation conducted by the investigating officer. The dispute was no prejudice to the accused, he was also a complaint. Otherwise, the courts had to look at the evidence and the standard that was presented to prove the accused's guilt. No one can be acquitted on technical grounds unless he is prejudiced by an unqualified officer. It is alleged that the recovery witnesses were not justified. The officers' forces are so good immigration advocates contact from Qasba Gujrat lawyer