Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR AHMAD versus THE STATE

Section 2 30c (c) The value of the evidence and the location of the incident was almost confessed. The accused was accused of shooting the victim, even though there was no previous rivalry between the parties and the witnesses, but to some extent Was convinced by the trial court. The accused's presence was also accepted by the trial court with the testimony of the witness in relation to his presence and the incident described, and there was no need to state that he would make a false statement that does not envy the accused. Will be. During the incident, there was a blow from the injury which led to the beating on his left arm and while the victim was trying to get another blow, the accused fired two bullets at the victim, who was present in the courtroom during the trial. The source firing was significant. Late and the cause of his death proved to be correct, the parties were not present after the previous rivalry when a man slammed people gathered in a kabaddi match, which angered the accused, resulting in physical There was a quarrel and he later died, the victim alleged that his arm had been broken from the dead, but he had not taken any goods from him. The specific request under Section 100, PPC, is a wave of outrage and desire to defraud the defendant with a suit, the accused has been prosecuted under Section 302 (c), the PPC accused Sentenced and sentenced under Section 302 (c). ), PPC Since there has been outrage by the late, the High Court will not pay any compensation nor will it accept the penalty against the accused. immigration advocates from Loralai lawyer