Find a Lawyer

SHAHAB DIN versus THE STATE

In the absence of any hostility between the parties to the testimony of Section 2302 (b), there was no question of the accused being lied to in this case; the matter was exposed day by day and the accused went to the complaining party. There was nothing wrong with the identity of the victim, according to the doctor who performed the post mortem of the deceased when, as the incident took place, the prosecution was informed that the bullet recovered from the victim's body appeared. It was reported that a rifle was used in the attack and the number of suspects was similar to the number of people injured. Witnesses' relationship with the deceased was not a standard to exclude their evidence. The trial court applied Alibi's plea to be lied to by the accused, whose motive was also part of the cause and the motive for the incident. In the presence of witnesses, the medical evidence confirmed the spot and the academic account permanently, it was satisfactorily proved that it was the accused who had long been his co-accused Had died, had committed the murder of the deceased, in the absence of any mitigating circumstances, the trial would have reduced the accused, The court sentenced the accused to death and sentenced him to death, the accomplices were acquitted. solicitors from Thatta lawyer