Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SARWAR versus THE STATE

Section 302 (b) was charged with defining evidence that was recorded immediately after the FIR incident occurred in the light of day and there was no question of false confinement, substitution or misidentification. , Witnesses had no enmity against the accused and their testimony could not be excluded. Based on their close relationship with the deceased, there were natural witnesses to the incident who underwent a lengthy investigation, medical evidence confirmed the ocular evidence, the defense's request seemed to have its benefit already. Was not established. The accused has been punished with a lesser fine and the punishment has been maintained under the circumstances. property advocates from Battagram lawyer