Find a Lawyer

IKRAM SHAH versus THE STATE

Section 14 and 9 of the charge of allegations of corruption and allegations of corruption If an individual is charged under Section 9 (a) (vi) (vii) of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999, this is the prosecution The first would be reasonable. And the first case against the accused is the fact that a person accused of prosecuting in an accountability court does not give rise to a crime in relation to section 14 of the ordinance, where the prosecutor started the trial on record. Is sufficient evidence to the satisfaction of the court that oral and documentary evidence that the accused and his family did not have the proper means to purchase such a large property as mentioned in the reference and that they did not have a valid, immovable property. In the form of property and assets were bought with illicit money, to prove this burden Property, immovable property and assets of both the accused and make him / her FA purchased. The financial members, with their legally earned money, passed on to the accused and his family members whom the trial court had issued with the notice to justify their earnings, according to Section 14 of the Contempt of Contempt Concept ( d) The term I used was rational. tax advocates from FR Bannu lawyer