Find a Lawyer

HAJAN KHAN versus THE STATE

Section 2302 (b), on the evidence scrutiny, proceeded with the confessional statement of the accused in connection with the confessional statement of the accused and the recovery of the weapons that proved the crime. The defendant's negative confessional statement was recorded 13 days after his arrest, that is, on the last day of his remand, neither the complainant nor his sister-in-law whose name was listed on the FIR were required to file a prosecution case. Was not brought to trial for advocacy. According to the FIR, only the suspect was suspected but he never appeared in the witness box to prove his whereabouts. The defendant's confession did not conform to the confessional statement, medical evidence and was not endorsed by any other independent and credible evidence. Bad in the situation patent advocate from Jacobabad lawyer