Find a Lawyer

DR. ZAFER AHMAD versus MST. SHAMSA

Sections 5, 9 (5) (a) of the West Pakistan Family Court Rules 1965 and the schedule of the West Pakistan Family Courts Rules, 1965, R13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition for Ex parte Rehabilitation and Maintenance, During the trial proceedings, the plaintiff was declared to be a former party. The Family Court had approved the earlier order after the previous decree was dismissed when the previous decree had already been announced, the Appellate Court dismissed the time for the defendants' appeals. Plaintiffs, who had banned the affidavit filed in support of their application under R13 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Rules, 1965, denied the summons service, the defendant's signature stated that the affidavit was filed by the Belfast Post. It is completely different from the copy of the simulations offered by me. In the case that the courier service was rendered to someone else, the inquiry was reasonably necessary to arrive at a reasonable conclusion Family Court rejected the request to set the former party order on the basis that the pre-order order It was announced earlier that there was no reason for the law to be considered. Such punitive observations have clearly negated the provisions of section 9 (5). (A) whether the Family Court was required to pass an order in express orders while performing the duties of judicial partition while avoiding such slip and inappropriate order of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 Whether or not the defendant was able to make a good assignment was not considered to be due to a previous absence or to the Family Court to ignore the provision of the law and to approve an arbitration order. Hi to best advocate from Landi Kotal lawyer