Find a Lawyer

MALIK SALAHUDDIN versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER

Section 491 Habitat Corporations petition was not applicable under CRPC 491 because under the provisions of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1967, Ditto had alternative treatment to the higher authorities unless otherwise the applicant (Dityan) The court had concealed the material facts from the petitioner. The petition did not mention that it had borrowed from the Corporation High Court, therefore, it was not inclined to arbitrate in favor of the applicant and has no jurisdiction to respond to Section 491CC. To resolve the contentious question in summary proceedings. However, in connection with justice and fair acting, he was instructed to release Danteo after receiving Rs 50,000 from him and upon his release he would be able to easily receive the account from his responsibilities by the respondents. To allow his family to escape disaster. solicitors from Sherani lawyer