WAHID versus THE STATE
The Pakistan Penal Code section 302, 337 AM & 148 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was according to the role played by the accused facts account and it was immediately affected by the filing of the FIR. ? The defendant, who had effectively linked his gun to the victim, had acknowledged the motive and the incident, but claimed the use of the right of private defense of the man and the property, according to the testimony of an eyewitness who won through the suspect. He did not tell the truth, was rightly rejected by the courts to the extent that the false eye witnesses were present at the place where they were present, and they have seen the same and their testimony, reliable. Having confidence in such a situation will not negate or outweigh the conflicting medical opinion. Revoke the eyewitness identification value. There were legal, valid and compelling reasons given by the courts that came to know about the crime. And reasonable doubt reasonable reasonable reasonable reasonable reasonable reasonable doubt justified doubt proved to be a proven sentence sentence sentence sentence sentence sentence sentence sentence sentence sentence sentence sentence sentence sentence accused accused sentence sentence accused accused accused The accused accused was the alleged accused who was allegedly accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Sanghar lawyer