Find a Lawyer

REHMAT JAN versus IQBAL

Article 13 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 (3) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXI of 1969), Article 25 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Prohibition of dismissal of service, complaint of dismissal of employee, evidence presented by the accused There was no clear process that could be attributed to the worker during the incident, which could reasonably prove that the uproar was inconsistent or unstable to bring the matter under the provisions of the Constitution. It was prosecuted under the Labor Court. Also, the Labor Appellate Tribunal did not consider the evidence that led to the dismissal of the workers' complaint and because the worker admitted the charge sheet to the Labor Appeal Tribunal while also appealing the worker's appeal. Evidence was pointed at the rejection. The approach adopted by the courts below is arbitrary and speculative to guarantee the interference with the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court Order of dismissal of the workers and to reject the jurisdiction within them, One was laid aside and the worker was allowed to re-enter the job. criminal advocate from Bunner lawyer