Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR versus SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LIMITED

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 12 (3) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section On August 5, the Supreme Court upheld an appeal to consider whether the oral dismissal of employees violated section 12 (3) of the Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, which it expressly It was provided that an employee's services could be terminated by only one. The written order, for obvious reasons, was with both the Labor Court and the Labor Appellate Tribunal, but the High Court did not participate in the matter. Was there any classification of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, section 1 of 1968, like the 'Delegated Wagers', in which different classes and categories of workers were listed. Whether the Employers / Applicants were to operate within the meaning of the Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, and the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, and in the Labor Court in respect of the rights guaranteed under the provisions of such employees. Protest your complaint. The Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, and whether special employment / special, employees followed their procurement before the National Industrial Relations Commission, and thus it was sufficient to waste time in these operations. Delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908, in any case delaying the discretion of the Labor Appellate Tribunal, such discretion was not available to the High Court to reverse the decision of exercising extraordinary jurisdiction in the constitutional application. ? registration advocate from Larkana lawyer