ABDUL MAJEED versus STATE
Section 345 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), investigating crimes between a Muslim and a non-Muslim, was a Muslim and the legal heirs of the victims were non-Muslim, who had given the statement under which they had to forgive the accused and Before the trial. The objection raised by the prosecution and the deity's objection is that no compromise could be reached between them as the parties were Muslim and non-Muslim. The competent competency of the offense was only qualification under ification 345, and there was no restriction on the request for compromise. Compromising a Muslim or a non-Muslim can also have an effect between a Muslim and a non-Muslim, and a compromise between the non-Muslims has also been accepted and the accused is acquitted. went.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Sikandarabad lawyer