Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFTAB KHAN versus DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER SECONDARY

R17 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Sections 42 and 44, the abolition of the post of Deputy Qasim for which the Headmaster of the school appointed as Appellant did not come out, but the Headmaster / Created by the Education Officer. The appellant's appointment was canceled and instead another person was challenged by the appellant in the writ petition before the High Court which was rejected by the High Court that after posting the advertisement in this case, the post was filled up again. And the application authority should be summoned under the guidance. The High Court, disseminating this post, constituted a selection committee which, after taking the test and interviewing, appointed a person who was not a party to the case, who participated in the test and interview, Was in compliance with the High Court order. But failing to get an appointment on the merit, he challenged the High Court's order in an appeal before the Supreme Court that the High Court was not legally required if it were to advertise the post and to conduct tests and interviews. Go and that the appointment made by the headmaster could not be canceled without hearing the hearing when the appellant participated in the proceedings pursuant to the High Court decision and failed. He cannot be allowed to challenge the decision of the High Court in the jurisdiction of the writ to seek appointment, in which breath the party cannot be allowed to blow hot and cold, before appeal to the Supreme Court. An appeal was filed by the appellant because the appellant had sought it. Complaint against the person to whom the Head Ma advocates from Kech lawyer