AHMED YAR QADRI versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR JOYA
Code of Conduct 1908 Section 115 Review The Sel Todd Trial Court, considering the circumstances and all the evidence on record, found that the sale process was void in law and was without any legal authority. Was against the rights. Appellant's first appellate court, on appeal, ignored the evidence on record, failed to consider the reasons recorded by the trial court, and by banking on unacceptable and irrelevant deliberations and illegal assumptions. The finding of the trial court's jurisdiction overturned the results. The first appellate court, however, could not maintain the High Court, because of the error of argument and the law's impropriety, in the circumstances required to reject the lower appellate court's decision under its jurisdiction under CPC. Had jurisdiction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Ahmadpur East lawyer