HAZRAT BILAL versus STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/109 and 324/109 Laws in this Martyrdom (10 of 1984), Article 43 The accused and the accused were not jointly tried in this case till the accused was under trial, the co-accused. , The maker's confession guilt, had already been executed and died, neither of the two accused could be jointly prosecuted, nor could the co-accused be examined as a witness in another case where the accused The joint trial that was considered by Article 43 was litigation, 1984, therefore, the case was never completed and was done. Consider the confessional statement of an accused against the accused in a second trial with the accused by a co-accused. In another case where it was not being jointly heard with the accompanying accused, it was illegal. Either being out of fear or out of a natural desire, by the clutches of police motivation, the loneliness, linking the accused to the commission of this crime in the absence of evidence, could not have led to the conviction, Was true The case of the fugitive accused has gone awry
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Hattian lawyer