Find a Lawyer

SHER MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Section 9 (c) / 15 of the Control of Drugs Act 1997 defines the evidence that the lady accused of potentially carrying ten kilograms of marijuana on her body, or otherwise, is seeking the accused and not the resident. A home search and not a search. The enclosed premises did not require the companionship of two or more respected persons in the area, and in this case Section 103 was not attracted to the provisions of the CR PC and the judicial proceedings may cause slight contradiction in the evidence of the prosecution. , But for any reason he did not fight against the material fact of the recovery of marijuana from the possession of the accused at the date, time and place of receipt of the parcel in the chemical inspector's office, nor was he prosecuted in the prosecution case. ? , Nor did it affect the dishonesty of the investigation. The evidence of the crime did not affect the prosecution's evidence. Under the circumstances, punishment and punishment of the perpetrators was maintained property advocates from Havelian lawyer