Find a Lawyer

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN versus M. NAWAZ KHOKHAR

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 The results of the repeal of an ordinance / termination of the act were simple and simultaneous cancellation and the re-enactment of a legislature, the effect of the Ordinance Principals Ordinance (CXI of 1996) was enforced by the same Ordinance (XX). Was canceled 1997), which was an oral production of the Ordinance (CXI of 1996) and of the Ordinance (XX of 1997), eventually changed to permanent legislation when the Legislature passed the Impact of Accountability Act, 1997 while the Ordinance (CXI of 1996) was a There was temporary legislation but the Legislature intended to repeal the provisions of the Act through the first Ordinance (XX of 1997) and then convert the law into an act of law and pass the Act (IX of 1997), Therefore, the express intention was on the part of the Legislature that, while issuing the Ordinance (XX of 1997), the provisions of the Ordinance (CXI of 1996) became the subject of section 28 (the repealed clause). Although the Code of Ordinance (XX of 1997) could not have been specifically protected under the Ordinance (CXl of 1996), the law established to keep the Ordinance (CXI of 1996) alive. There was a clear intention from the Constituent Assembly. 1997) proceedings initiated under the Ordinance (CCI of 1996), therefore, can be continued even after the cancellation of the Ordinance (CXI of 1996) under the Ordinance (1997 XXI). power of attorney advocate Hariwala lawyer