Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD QASIM versus STATE

Testimony of Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 Evidence Both witnesses maintained that they were at the complainant's house at the time of proceedings at the site of the incident and were only attracted to the noise and after the incident arrived. Recognized The slogan also acknowledged the disappointment of the witnesses that no one else in the village was attracted to the noise or the noise made by the victim that all other residents of the village had made this noise. Only eye-witnesses have come to their notice of neglect and noise. In the testimony of eyewitnesses in which the witnesses claimed that the accused had indeed injured the deceased victim, the statement of eyewitnesses could not be accepted that the accused was not on the spot. Deid escaped upon the arrival of witnesses and did not refrain from slapping. Of the deceased, this was also impossible because the offender chooses to commit the crime at night, it is necessary to try it o Keeping his / her identity confidential is the complainant who was the bus driver he admitted that night. The complainant had to restrict that he was not on duty and was on leave the night of the incident, but he had failed to bring anything in. The record was not credible to prove the fact that the complainant was present in the village on the night of the incident, a prosecution witness who was a resident of different villages, witnessed an opportunity because he could not prove his presence in the village. Where the incident took place was the complainant who was brother killed and abducted power of attorney advocate Khair Pur lawyer