Find a Lawyer

LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, RAWALPINDI versus DINA

Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 23 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Acquisition of land compensation, increase in the High Court after considering the testimony of witnesses and documenting evidence as valid on record. The addition orders were approved, it seemed to be based on a fair and just standard, the High Court did not properly consider the potential of the land acquired at the time of the verdict, nor the plaintiffs' suggestion on the plaintiff. , Which could not be discounted, was recorded to detect the fact. Through the High Court, it was found that the land acquired was located in the Revenue State, which was within the limits of the cantonment and had access to urban facilities such as roads, gas, electricity, telephone etc. At that time, some part of the land was in the possession of the airfield, while the others were under the control of the crop, and the High Court found that the agricultural land acquired under the possibility of being used for residential purposes was a legal right. The increase was in line with the principles established by the High Court to provide for reasonable compensation to landlords who, as a result of compulsory acquisition, were deprived of land that was not subject to any legal weakness of the High Court's good judgment. Therefore, the High Court was not responsible for the inquiry because it interfered with the misrepresentation or misuse of the material piece of evidence. The Supreme Court, thus, refused to interfere with the High Court's decision and conclusions. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Wahi hassain lawyer