UNITED BANK LIMITED versus SHAHMIM AHMED KHAN
United Bank Limited (Staff) Service Rules 1981 R 15 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 212 (3) and 25 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 2A Benefits of Mandatory Return Scheme for Employees Returned Employees In order to appeal such employee restitution orders through the Service Tribunal Validation Leave, the Supreme Court had passed the Bank of Labor to examine the question of law, despite the fact that the employees were considered public servants. For this purpose, the Civil Servants Act, 1973, he was employed by a corporation and, therefore, in the absence of any legal laws, The bond between the obligatory was the master and the servant. In view of economic stability, the bank was entitled to reduce the number of staff. That the bank was entitled to reorganize its business to operate more efficiently, and if some staff members were rendered useless in the process, the bank was entitled to terminate its services, the service tribunal said. Points were created. Its decision is contrary to the laws imposed by the Supreme Court. The service tribunal erred in ordering the re-hiring of employees and the continuation of the respondents, even if there had been a mistake by the service tribunal in insulting the legal status in different places, but the result was That is, the retirement scheme was illegally applied to employees, right and so was the scheme, Article 25 of the Constitution was also violated and the principle of natural justice was also violated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Neelam lawyer