Find a Lawyer

IHSAN SONS (P.) LTD. versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 26 and 32 of Article 962 (1) / 90, Article 129 of 1990 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Exemption The applicant had valid import license and got the required export manufacturing bond license. Went and placed it before the Customs. Authorized government officials / ministries have issued various certificates, making it appear that the applicant industry is a textile industry and their product's surgical wool has been listed in the textile record It shows that the applicants have not made any false or false statement, nor can their provisions be pressed into service under Sections 26 and 32 of the Customs Act 1969, nor can the Customs authorities issue notice to the applicants. In the circumstances, Section R-962 (1) / 90, dated 129 1990 was entitled to take advantage. Any notice under section 5 (2) (3) of the Customs Act 1969 was banned from time to time, as the goods recovered reached the Karachi Port and between these dates, between 12 12 1990 and 10 1 1991. And whether or not the documentation of the refund claim was verified and / or authorized by the relevant authority and there was no allegation that the applicants had deliberately made a false or false statement. For relief works it is claimed that the authorities could not export them under the exemption under section R-962 (I) / 90, whose import date of 129 1990 and the actual date of reference to the Iqra surcharge in 264. Exceptions were made to the former PAN order and the impedance order. The Authority's 1995 was without illegal and unlawful powers and as such, the authorities were obliged to refund not only the applicants female advocates from Ugoki lawyer