GUL GHAMEER versus JANE ALAM, ADVOCATE
The offense of fornication (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 11 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), section 559 under the revocation of the discharge order did not challenge the discharge order under section 169, CR PC was done. Such order was finalized by the magistrate before the sessions court within 30 days and the complainant refrained from his conduct to challenge it by petition under section 555A, CCPC. Under which they adopted a very new method to discredit defendants, including two advocates. It appears that the defaulter started from the quarter which was misused to misuse the court application process, therefore, the special expenses of Rs 10,000 paid by the complainant to the respondents Was deleted with
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Khushab lawyer
