Find a Lawyer

STATE versus PIR MAZHARUL HAQUE

Accountability Ordinance 1997 Section 3 and 31 Accountability Ordinance (XX of 1997), Section 2 (g) (iv) Karachi Development Authority Order (5 of 1957), Article 52A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 9Artment Plot in Industrial Changing the use and allotment of the accused (beneficiary) under Section 3 and 31, Accountability Act, 1997 to the other two accused accountability references and exchanging the impact of welfare schemes pursuing illegal and non-operative procedures. Such events would have been commonplace on a large scale, therefore, unlawful conversion of welfare schemes generally In case of loss or damage caused by use of the plot of the standing facilities on the public level of evidence on the public record stood for much more than that will not be so serious and fundamental. The loss on the occasion of the loss, therefore, need not be considered in the latter aspect. The Minister (the accused) had no legal authority to ease the procedure involved in Article 52A, Karachi Dewal. Operational Authority Order, 1957 Also, the move would benefit the people from illegally depriving people of the right to use welfare schemes to convert militancy against plastic into Article 9 of the constitution and the allotment of the accused was declared illegal. Was. The three accused, namely the Minister who ordered such conversion, the other accused (worker) who prepared the summary for the Minister and the beneficiary, were declared guilty under Section 3, Accountability Act 1997 and He was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs 20 lakh each top advocate from Theing Jattan More lawyer