Find a Lawyer

AIJAZ DAHAR versus STATE

Sections 5, 6, 8 and 14 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act 1975 (XLV of 1860), Section 392/34 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) ), Section 57 sub-divisional magistrate before the indictment submitted a report of the action against the accused by the station house officer, alleging that the accused was remotely guilty of bad character and gave his weapon, Committed the crime himself and encouraged the crime, that the accused received stolen property. The lie gathered the news of the town and brought it to the robbers. The lie prevented the women and that, after receiving a report from Section 11 0, they carried the deadly and dangerous weapon with the sub-divisional magistrate and the tribunal, but, on this day, the arrest warrant for the accused was arrested. Was issued and the same day the sub divisional magistrate and tribunal passed the order under section 8 (3) (b) of the Sindh Crimes Control Act 1975 and handed it over. The allegations in Section H's report proved to be ambiguous, false and public in nature, with the date, time and place the actions mentioned were not mentioned in the report. And required to present the details of a case under section 6 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act of 1975, all the witnesses in the report were not included police personnel and all the divisional magistrates used their judicial mind and Immediately after the inquiry, the warrants were issued without bail and the accused was taken into custody by Se Off break. Article 5 and 6 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act, 1975 list of advocates from Umer Kot lawyer