Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus MUHAMMAD HAYAT

The law shall not be agreed to resolve its dispute regarding special oath of testimony R 1984 and 1984 section 6 Sindh Act (VIII of 1873), section 8 law evidence (10 of 1984), exchange of suit 129 suit. However, the defendants themselves were not convinced of the correct nature of the matters and they were not true to the claim that the transaction in the case was an observation of the appellate court that the defendants had not only Special offer was rejected. Before it was recognized that the transaction in question was in fact a sale, it must be kept in mind and given weight, especially when it was not specifically challenged, even otherwise. The evidence on record will lead to an uncontested conclusion that the transaction was a sale and not an exchange. , And for that reason, the one that was in line with the emotions before jobs for fresh advocates from Kot Addu lawyer