RAJA MUHAMMAD HAYAT KHAN versus RAJA SHAKEEL AHMAD KHAN
Civil Procedure Code Order VIII and Section 14 of the CPC Writing Statement [as amended by the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right to Pre-Purchase (Amendment) Act, 1993] Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O VIII, R 11 Plaintiff's Rejection In the Pre-Impression Suit, on the basis that, at the time of trial, the vendor had obtained the plaintiff's status as a plaintiff requesting the dismissal of the plaintiff under OVII, R 11, CPC. Can be made by amending the statement and no miscellaneous application was guaranteed There was no restriction to b, so the courts did not err in dismissing the plaintiff under OVII, R 11, CPC. Because the vendor had improved its position at the time of the trial, there was no guarantee of interference with the incomplete order to dismiss the plaintiff in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Bhera lawyer