Find a Lawyer

ABDUR RASHID versus EHSANULLAH

Withdrawal of leave to the plaintiff by the plaintiff on behalf of the parties concerned with the implementation of the Civil Procedure Code Order XXIII of the CPC and the adjustment of the suit O XXIII, R 1 Object O XXIII, R 1, the CPC The case was present from the beginning without disclosing the defects and the defendant identified it but no attention was paid by the same plaintiff, however, the court returned the case with permission to file a fresh case. Took the remand from the appellate court while the case was on the way. The mistake that the plaintiff's failure to make the necessary party, which was correctly identified by the defendant at the earliest date, cannot be termed as a regular defect and the opportunity for the plaintiff to begin a new trial is not allowed. May be. best advocate from Daska lawyer