Find a Lawyer

GHAUS BAKHSH versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 Defendant's declaration and permanent injunction claiming that he was the owner of the land in question. The defendants claimed that they had purchased the land from the same vendor and were declared defective. Valuable buyers had invested a huge amount of money on the construction of the house, which the plaintiff's case was settled by the courts, under which the real owners sold their total holdings, of which the defendants had bought the land under question, , The original owners had nothing left to do. The question of selling the disputed land to the defendants can hardly arise, even if the defendants had spent some money on the construction of the house, in fact, they could not have been able to defeat the plaintiff's case. Failed to show that at the time of sale, the question still remained in the name of the original owners, which could be purchased by them, in the favor of the trial defendants by the decision of the appellate court. Will not demand, however, if it is advised, she may seek her remedy against the shopkeepers. best law firm from Hattian lawyer