Find a Lawyer

FAIZ BAKHSH versus FAQIR MUHAMMAD

Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 30 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Suit for trial and premature discharge by the first appellate court HC And based on that the High Court dismissed the litigation. Along with the documentary evidence, official testimony also found that the occupation was with the shopkeepers at least 25 12, 1969, when Patwari was in fact notified of the sale and was recorded in the journal Waketti. And the case was out of the case for premature dismissal in 1971. To file a lawsuit for the enforcement of the pre-emption right of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, the limit of the limit fixed under section 30, the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, for a period of one year. The sale by the officer will start from the date of confirmation. Approval of the change or the date on which the vendor physically seized any part of the land under sale, whichever was earlier on record-based High Court. It was found out that the shopkeepers had possession of the property in the legal proceedings on 25 12, 1969, after which the suit for notice of notice would begin before it was filed on 1 3 1971, hence the time limit. Court search was stopped, therefore, the appeal was denied in unexpected circumstances famous supreme court advocate from Chaghi lawyer