Find a Lawyer

ASAD RIAZ versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, LAHORE

West Pakistan Stability Holding Ordinance 1960 Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199 applicants claim that the inclusion of specific measles numbers in the defendants' docket was not averse to the concept of stability operation, nor to the Board of Directors. The board accepted it. Neither the Revenue nor the High Courts have claimed that the hearing was not heard by the Board of Revenue; the petitioner and the defendants were not affected in any way by amending the scheme. The canal was excluded from only one piece of measuring land. The applicant's Wanda and in turn another 4 kasal land of Khasra No. were also included, after such modification it was decided that the underground question was in accordance with the main block of the respondents and by the same carrying The applicant's main plot would not be disturbed and he said that it would seem that arrangements would be in the convenience of both parties, that such results of tax classification were not challenged as to which piece of land. Must go to one or the other party must decide the commitment by the revenue authorities, especially in the constitutional jurisdiction. In such cases, the High Court cannot sit in judgment against the decision of the revenue authority. The exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction did not guarantee that there was no question of public importance that an examination was required, but the leave to appeal was denied in the circumstances. pakistani advocates Pishin lawyer