Find a Lawyer

MAHMUDI BEGUM versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XXIII R 3 and Section 12 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) concluded the sale contract's specific performance suit whereby The applicant had. Deposit was considered to have been deposited in the court and the defendant's such accumulated case was dismissed, but on the failure of the applicant to submit that date as the due date, the defendant had to settle the matter. I had to decide. Failure to submit the deposit as per the said date, the defendant filed an application for the consent decree, after which the court ordered the applicant to execute the sale process in favor of the respondents. Instead, be sure to complete the sale in favor of the defendant through a specific date petitioner. The application of the trial court under section 12 (2) was granted to the CPC against the applicant under section 12 (2), the CPC was also dismissed by the trial court. GH Court Accuracy The High Court in its uncontested decision took notice of the fact that the sale agreement has been seen by the applicant's husband in favor of the respondents. The applicant denied any agreement between himself and the defendant. Did not, therefore, lie. To say from his mouth that the fraud was imposed on the applicant who had moved the request for extension of time to deposit the money under the settlement agreement shows that he relied on the decree. What was it, now he has been cheated by the High Court power of attorney advocate Chak Sawara lawyer