MUHAMMAD I1YAS versus S.H.O., BADDOMALHI, DISTRICT NAROWAL
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 561 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Criminal Delinquency Act, 1984, Section 5 Infection of Prohibited Anti-Drugs Act, 1979, Sections 3 and 4 used to interfere with the High Court's power to investigate. Could not be done. Police denied the suspect's arrest and asked if the arrest warrant was from another person or was to be resolved by the trial court during the investigation or trial of the accused and not arrest the accused in the extradition proceedings. Subsequently, under the section 5 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir fugitives' endorsement Act, 1984, the district magistrate was required to submit it to the Anti-Narcotics Force in the R (Pakistan) instead of referring it to the High Court / Shariah Court. Police arrest the accused after the arrest of the accused with the direction of the District Magistrate M (Azad Kashmir) Has been instructed to deliver. As envisaged by the relevant law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from FR Peshawar lawyer