MUHAMMAD BANARAS KHAKAN versus RUBINA CHAUDHARY
The Law Evidence Order 1984 Article 114 Contract Act (IX of 1872), the execution of a contract of sale by the seller's mother, who owns the suit property, also gifted her daughters such The contract is confirmed by one of his daughters, who said sellers refuse to implement after-sales contracts. The mother of influencers who moved the property in favor of their daughters, the original documents on the articles were retained and she appears to have full control over her daughters. The mother (defendant) had the necessary authority to represent her daughters, handing over the original documents and personal data to the defendants with which to confirm and sell the plaintiff through at least one shopkeeper (defendant). Associates will be approved by the Associate Membership. It is indicated that the mother (defendant) had entered into a contract with the plaintiff as her daughter's representative on behalf of the other defendants who had full knowledge of her, and through their conduct Affirmed that the plaintiff plaintiff believed that the contract was the authorized plaintiff Following the execution of such agreement, the defendant was denied the contract of law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Bhera lawyer