MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 526 Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/342/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Transferring a Trial to a Prosecutor's Witness Which of his statements was the chief in his examination and in his international examination, it did not appear that he was being discriminated against because the trial court had asked questions to explain the ambiguity arising in the statement. It was authorized under the law. Nor was the court charged with any prejudice because of the fact that the deceased was the brother of a senior High Court judge who did not come to the conclusion that either the trial court Was terminated. The defense lawyer's surrounded by the prosecutor's lawyer was not prejudiced about the situation as there was no case for the defense lawyer to be able to perform his duties. False statements of the court cited contradictory remarks by the trial court regarding the defense lawyer's behavior that he was delaying the trial, there was no basis for transfer of the case, according to which the leave of appeal was denied. Was.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Pasni lawyer