Find a Lawyer

SMUHAMMAD AZIM KHAN versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Clause 7 of the Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974, Pakistan (1973), Article 212 questions related to sanitary anti-seniority were raised by the appellant that the service tribunal had a two-year training period as a service in the service tribunal. Was treated correctly. The Fixing Respondents' Sanitary Service Tribunal found itself unable to proceed with the appeal of the court's jurisdiction; the facts of the case appeared to be misunderstood from the service tribunal's point of view when the service tribunal's appeal was seized. And an appeal was made to determine the inter-state commitment. The parties, however, held that the fact that the appellants had objected to the jurisdiction in support of their request that the defendants were younger than them and that they wanted to exclude the two-year training period as Was made in the case of the appellant. And that such calculations cannot be taken into account in determining the parties' inter-state sanity, it should appoint the service tribunal to the jurisdiction without going into the merits of the remanded case for the decision on appeal to the merit. Can't think of removing from tax advocates from Karore Lalisan lawyer