NISAR MUHAMMAD versus SULTAN ZARI
Article 491 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Habitat corporation's application covers minors In this case two male minors are admitted under the age of seven and three women have not yet succeeded. Is. Since adolescence was less than eight years old, the respondent (mother), currently section 491, was entitled to "Hazna" from the under-five children for the limited purpose of the CCPC, and the applicants in the custody of minors. Were rights. They had not yet been charged, so the detention of the aforesaid juveniles with the applicants was rightly declared illegal or at least inappropriate by the fact that the determination of the final custody was, of course, The guardian will lie with the judge. If the parties were instructed to approach them if they would like to leave, in the circumstances the appeal was refused [unanimously agreed by Master Shaheen Bin Zia Muhammad PLD 1994]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer