PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus MUHAMMAD BASHIR
Law Evidence Order 1984 Arts 131 and 162 Proof of Procedure The Court of Duty of Confession should answer it when it recognizes the evidence and should object to it, and before becoming part and parcel of the court record The decision must be made where the documentary evidence was denied. Defendants, on the basis of the trial court's finding that it was not proven according to the law and that the objections to the admissibility of the case are pending, dismissed the evidence and sought to prove such documents in accordance with the law. was done. Thus, the courts were subjected to unlawful exercise of jurisdiction to rely on the judgment and orders, patent law, and evidence, which were not admitted in accordance with the law. Was sent to the trial court for a hearing. In accordance with the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Kamalia Musa lawyer