Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALI SHAH versus KHUDAYAR

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 9 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XXI, 8 100 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), the court was closed for leave at the end of section 4, the execution of the respondents of treatment Was dismissed on 31st 1973 under the Decree, and filed its case under section 9, Special Relief Act, 1877, on 13 2 1974, several days after the expiry of the courts, When provided for filing an objection petition under the AXC, 8 100, the CPC is 30 days whereas instead of filing the respondent's objection petition under Section 9, Special Relief Act, 1877 The case was filed after the expiry of the trial, even if such a case was filed by the defendant, the respondent had not filed a petition for defamation, at this time, , Has nothing to do with travel within the prescribed time limit of the Limitation Supply Act, 1908, because it only provides that when the period set by the court for the suit, etc., expires, There may also be suits, etc. Established upon the reopening of the provisions of section 4, the limitation act shall not extend to the prescribed duration nor can it be provided That the leave period shall be excluded from the period of limitation set out under OXI, 8 100, the thirty-day period after filing before the CPC was bound to be dismissed when the time-bound respondents erred. Opting for the forum, the Opposition brought this fact to them at an early stage but they did not pay any attention until they were directed to apply through the Appellate Court. Appropriate list of advocates from Tall lawyer