Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHALIL versus P.R. T.C.

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI VI 1968), Section O15 (3) Employees employed were dismissed on charges of dismissal. ? Fifteen bucks without issuing a ticket to the passenger and he left the three passengers completely unaware that the evidence against the employees was heard in nature because many passengers on the bus or at least some of them were not inspected. And even the statements were not made. The driver of the bus was not taken down. The employee had served about ten years before the alleged accident, but never before had any such complaint been filed, even if it was discovered that the employee had received government money. Is allegedly involved in this amount of less than Rs 50, he did not make any serious allegation or gave any example of corruption when a part of the employee If the employee is found to be reluctant to perform his duties for the first time or is found to be unfaithful, he or she may be well-molested and thrilled and may be terminated from the job. Extreme fines were not guaranteed, dismissal orders were laid against employees. Conditions when you need a advocate from Mangowal lawyer