MESSRS DAWOOD COTTON MILLS LTD KARACHI versus RUSTAM KHAN
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section Oz 12 (3) and 20 Service Termination of Employee Responsibilities Employees who worked for three years in the employer's mills What was, was terminated verbally without giving any reason for such an end. The employer claims that he gave a contractor a wage contract and that the employee was employed by the contractor and also paid the contractor, the employee failed to prove that he had dealt with any contractor. Was employed for Upon spot inspection it was found that the machinery was taken over by the raw material employer's management and the employee had worked with the employer's management for over three years so for whatever reason the employees' services were taken orally. And for obvious reasons the order was stopped. E-5 was required by the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 (3) to be present again.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Kurram Agency lawyer