MUHAMMAD BOOTA versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER
Articles 10, 13, 14, and 16 of the Adultery (Enforcement) Ordinance 1979, XLV of 1860 (XLV of 1860), Articles of Sections 324 and 294 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution / FIR of applicants Was. Instead of filing a case against the accused (defendants) under section 10, 13, 14 and 16 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 and under section 324, the PPC challaned only the section 294, PPC. Had filed a lawsuit under Had already been presented and admitted by the trial court, then it was not appropriate to re-order the trial court, based on the evidence, finding that the accused had committed some other crime, For that, she could blame them and if such crimes were not justified. Through a magistrate, he could send the case to a court of competent jurisdiction. The constitutional application was dismissed accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Shorkot lawyer
