PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus ABDUL HAMEED
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Bail bail was granted to the accused that further investigation in this case was required because it I was not given any role. His presence in the crime commission and in his car could be attributed to an innocent passenger. No strong material from the complainant was initially disclosed that the accused was the confidant of the commission of the crime, the complainant accompanied by the section HO. The report was lodged at the police station and thereafter, and thus, there was no doubt about the way it was investigated, the order to grant the accused bail cannot be overstated, nor can it be argued. There is no other conclusion to the crime other than crime. The accused could be investigated or justice was aborted for not considering any material aspect of the case whose request for cancellation of bail was dismissed under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Nawab Shah lawyer