Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB

Punjab Land Reforms (Procedure for Withdrawal Suit) Rules 1977 R 4 Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 (MLR 115), Para 25 (7) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Exiting Tenancy Practices in Court Must come Relationships between the landlord and the tenant's order deciding the landlord's tenant removal appeal / amendment against the Collector's Constitutional jurisdiction ruling, including Lux Standby's Board of Revenue's Revenue Forum Ask for The record also shows that the landlord and tenant relationship existed between the parties and that the tenant was proved under the claimant / claimant tenant while hearing the appeal against the order of the collector by the Additional Commissioner. Lack of jurisdiction over. To assist the tenant for this, such an objection was not raised in the proceedings up to the Board of Revenue, but he had submitted it even if it was deemed that the Additional Commissioner had no intention of hearing the appeal. There was no jurisdiction and when their verdict was pronounced, it was not a wrong decision and thus it was ignored altogether, yet the matter came up for hearing first. The Board of Revenue, which has been amended as an amending jurisdiction and the request of any affected person cannot be discussed under the provisions of Article 25 (7), Land Reform Regulation, 1972, It is clear from the time that the Board of Revenue in any way sought the time of its own motion or otherwise to record a case or proceeding or to accept or rectify the validity, legality or ownership of such action. famous lower court advocate from Karore Lalisan lawyer