Find a Lawyer

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, STORES AND WORKSHOP DIVISION, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, LAHORE versus IRRIGATION TUBEWELL WORKERS\' UNION (REGD.)

It is the Government's decision to abstain from the appointment of the respondents in 1978 on the basis of the charge of work under Section 25A of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 2A, 3, 9 and 199 Constitutional pleadings that belong to the category of the respondents. All employees should be made permanent employees and considered. Since the appointment was made on a regular basis, the defendants were not regularized because of the age of the Labor Court and the Labor Appeal Court ordered the restoration of the respondents' legal status in the constitutional application. The effective objection to the age-old objection by the respondents at the appropriate time, i.e. at the time of respondent's appointment or shortly after the petitioner was delayed in raising such an objection during the constitutional application process. The defendant gained sufficient expertise and experience to provide valuable services to the State's respondents When he was in the lowest position. It would be unfair for the employees to fight against the provisions of Articles 2A, 3 and 9 of the Constitution on such grounds when the applicant is in such a position as to be a government department. Should not have been done when the defendants were fully aware of their age at recruitment. Respondents will be deemed to have been pardoned, moreover, the Labor Appellate Tribunal's decision was submitted in 2 1995, while a constitutional petition against this decision was filed in January 1997, delaying the filing of the constitutional petition. Was not specified. That was not worth it criminal advocate from Sheikhupura lawyer