WARIS KHAN versus ZAINAB NISA
NWFP Pre-Emission Act 1987 Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was not entitled to validate the evidence during the hearing of the petition for leave of appeal by the Supreme Court, especially when the evidence was invalid by the courts. Seems to be annotated. Defendants claim that the sale price paid by them was paid in the presence of the Revenue Officer, which confirms the variation in sales. Defendants, however, admit that the officer affected by the change. They were not presented under the evidence they had produced together. The final outcome regarding the amount of payment cannot be declared arbitrary or misleading and therefore the appeal to be appealed by the Supreme Court seeking intervention.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Tobatek Singh lawyer