Find a Lawyer

ISRAR HUSSAIN MUGHAL versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

The petitioner, affected by section 44 constitutional application of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act of 1974, challenged the appointment of defendants on an ad hoc basis in the Department of Social Welfare and directed the concerned authorities to appoint merit based on fitness. Was asked Respondents to the constitutional petition with the law protested that the request was not maintainable because the applicant was not a bothering person who applied for the post of Assistant Director in the Department of Social Welfare, but was ignored, There was an MA in Social Works, which was a qualification that was struggling to get a job in a controversial and applicant position. Applicants, in the circumstances, cannot be said to some extent that he was not a provocateur. , The applicant was a directly provocative person, seeking to find him and every other state subject Was employed in the service of the State if it was qualified according to the rules and for this purpose the relevant authority of the jurisdiction of the court may be instructed that it is necessary by law to do the applicant, therefore, by any means He was a hot man and rightly appealed to the High Court jurisdiction. immigration advocates from Havelian lawyer