Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MIZAN versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 497 and 561A of the Foreign Act (XXXI of 1946), section 3/2 (A) / 14 [as amended by the Foreigners (Amendment) Ordinance (II of 1996)]. The inherent powers of the High Court, the use of police officers as the prosecution witnesses were not guaranteed, the arrest of the witnesses was unlikely to be tampered with by the law of the accused and the suspicion arising from the prosecution case The benefit was to be given to the accused foreign act. 1946, of course, banned the release of the accused on bail, but the High Court, exercising its inherent authority under Section 66, A, could issue appropriate orders to abolish the law of foreigners. Although convicted in 1946, he was sentenced to ten years and to less than two years, but the magistrate could not have convicted the accused under the Law Award sentence for ten years if he was found guilty. He was in custody for longer than that. n One year and his trial was not yet over, the accused was admitted on bail under conditions immigration advocate from Chowk Maitla lawyer