HAROON RASHID versus RIAZ UD DIN
West Pakistan Citizens Hire Ordinance 1959 Section 13 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O XVI, R 7 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Orders Mutual Orders Close Proof of Request for Petition Removal Beyond the tenant's request to add additional evidence, the rent controller rejected such orders challenged in the constitutional petition. No appeal was granted against the mutual orders, such orders were under the jurisdiction of the High Court constitution. Cannot be imposed in the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction Requires Luxury Standards Where Rent The main purpose of the petitioner was to delay the proceedings which were naturally quasi-judicial, being constitutional jurisdictional arbitrary relief that cannot be used to defeat the purpose of the law? The tenant was not entitled to arbitrary relief in the circumstances because of his conduct. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Vehari lawyer